Tucan.ai alternative in 2025: This is the right choice for you!

Tucan.ai alternative in 2025: How to make the right choice!

Not entirely sure what features Tucan.ai actually offers? You’re not alone.

Anyone looking for an AI-powered meeting assistant wants clear, transparent information about pricing, features, and integrations. While providers like Sally make this information openly available, Tucan.ai shares very little publicly. Neither pricing nor feature details are accessible on the website. And before you can even try the product, you’re required to schedule a sales call.

Functionally, there are also significant differences. Sally scores with extensive integrations, detailed language analysis, and coaching features. In contrast, Tucan.ai provides limited information in these areas. Though it may offer some unique strengths of its own.

In the following comparison, we’ll take a closer look at how these two AI meeting assistants perform in practice. And where their key differences lie.

Tucan.ai Alternative Sally: The Big Comparison

1. Transparency and pricing

• Sally: Offers open and transparent pricing directly on the website, with a tiered subscription model to fit different needs. Prices range from €8 to €73 per month, depending on the chosen plan.

• Tucan.ai: Provides no public pricing information. Access to pricing details is only possible through a sales call. According to customer reports, pricing proposals of up to €200 per user per month have been suggested. That is significantly higher than most competitors.

2. Data protection and GDPR compliance

Both Tucan.ai and Sally are Germany-based companies that attach great importance to data protection and are GDPR-compliant. In discussions with customers, Tucan.ai presented Sally's AWS servers as not GDPR-compliant. Although they are hosted in the EU and can be deactivated if desired - just like Tucan.ai.

• Tucan.ai: Uses sentiment analysis, which is often criticized under data protection regulations due to the potentially sensitive nature of the insights.

• sally: Deliberately avoids sentiment analysis to ensure full compliance with privacy standards and to protect user data.

3. Basic functions

Both offer essential functions such as transcription, speaker recognition, search and editing functions. However, there are key differences in how speaker identification is handled:

• Tucan.ai: Labels speakers generically as A, B, C, etc., without personalized identification

• Sally: Supports custom vocabulary and can recognize and display actual participant names, providing a more intuitive and user-friendly transcript.

4. Integration with other tools

• Sally: The possibilities of Integrating Sally are extensive: Integration with all major video conferencing platforms, calendars, as well as numerous CRM systems and business tools. These integrations are clearly documented and easy to access.

• Tucan.ai: Also supports integration with all major video platforms. However, there is no publicly available information about integrations with calendars, CRM systems, or other business tools.

5. AI-powered meeting analysis

Both Tucan.ai and the alternative Sally offer AI-powered insights, keyword tracking, and question-answer recognition. However, Sally takes it a step further with more advanced analytics.

• Sally: Provides deep analysis features such as speaking time shares, conversation dynamics, and automatic detection of customer objections. In addition, Sally offers AI based sales coaching.

• Tucan.ai: No public information is available regarding comparable features in the areas of conversation dynamics, objection tracking, or sales coaching.

6. Tucan Alternative Sally scores points for coaching and optimization functions

When it comes to coaching and meeting optimization, the Tucan.ai alternative Sally clearly stands out:

• Sally: Offers playbooks with automatic tracking, objection analysis, punctuality tracking, and filler word detection all designed to help teams improve communication and performance over time.

• Tucan.ai: Currently, there is no publicly available information about any comparable coaching or optimization features.

7. Voice recognition and multilingualism

• Sally: Supports over 35 languages and is capable of recognizing dialects and linguistic nuances, making it ideal for international and regionally diverse teams.

• Tucan.ai: Supports approximately 10 languages.

8. Unique Features

• Tucan.ai: Stands out with a feature for evaluating research data, including source references, which may be valuable in academic or knowledge-heavy environments.

• Sally: Offers in-depth language analysis and a wide range of coaching tools designed to improve communication quality and team performance over time.

Conclusion: Tucan or alternative Sally?

If you value transparency, extensive functions and strong data protection in an AI meeting assistants, Sally is the better choice. Tucan.ai remains opaque in many areas and demands high prices with no obvious added value.

Companies that want to make their meetings more efficient and optimize their teams through coaching in particular benefit from Sally's extensive analysis features and integrations. However, anyone who explicitly needs AI to evaluate research data could be better advised with Tucan.ai.

For most users, however, Sally offers the more rounded overall package — with clear price, full functional overview and with in-depth AI-driven analysis.

‍